What are some of the current changes occurring in the healthcare system?

Directions
Introduce yourself to your peers. Include the following:

• Your current nursing role and practice: Will add myself
• Your motivation for pursuing a DNP degree:::–advancing my clinical expertise, leadership skills,shaping pt care delivery, mentoring future nurse, say something on the line of such
• What are some of the current changes occurring in the healthcare system? How could these changes influence nursing research and the use of research findings?
• Below is the rubic for this assignment

Required Readings
 Polit & Beck’s Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing
 Chapter 1: Introduction to Nursing Research in an Evidence-Based Practice Environment
Recommended Readings
 Maryville University. (2022). Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP): A library research guide.

Participating in a Discussion Board
The following grading rubric and description for discussion boards will be used for all whole-class discussion board learner evaluations. Frequent and substantive posts to discussion boards are crucial in an online course as a method to foster the deep involvement of every learner. Discussion boards are an opportunity for learners to reflect on content and engage with their peers through the sharing of knowledge, experience, and current literature.
Key Points
 Learners will not be able to delete or revise posts once they have been saved.
 Suggest learners take several minutes reviewing their post prior to saving.
 It is recommended learners use create a post in Word, use Grammarly to review, and save to your computer to prevent loss of work due to an interruption during uploading.
 Please do not upload the Word document itself.
 Learners will not be able to view or respond to any other posts until their initial post is made and saved to the discussion board.
Requirements for Participation in a Discussion Board
 The learner will make an initial substantive post in response to forum questions by the end of Day 3.
 The learner will make two substantive peer response posts by the end of Day 6.
 A substantive post is defined as a minimum of 150 to 200 words.
 The initial post and peer responses must be original work.
 Learner will refrain from excessive quoting of reference sources.
 Peer response posts must be on two different days from the original initial post made.
This process ensures the learner is given adequate time to prepare and post initial responses as well as the necessary time to review peer postings and provide meaningful reactions which extend the conversation.
 Learners must provide two or more references with in-text citations to the current literature and/or assigned readings supporting assertions made in the original initial post.
 Learners must provide one or more references with in-text citations to the current literature and/or assigned readings supporting assertions made in BOTH peer response posts.
 References should be formatted to the most current edition of APA. Use the toolbar to assist with formatting such as italics (however, hanging indent is not available in web editing).
 Please note Canvas will sometimes reformat when the post is saved. There will be no deduction for this if all correct components of the reference per APA are met.
 References must be peer-reviewed literature, professional textbooks, and/or professional websites.
 Publication dates should be within the last five-years and relevant to the discussion topic.
 Non-academic resources are not acceptable such as Wikipedia, Medscape, WebMD, blogs without professionally-credentialed authors, and websites that do not relate to the discussion topic.
Evaluation of Learner Submissions
 Asynchronous discussion boards are evaluated for quality of postings and learner participation.
 The rubric for participating in a discussion board provides the criteria for learner evaluation.
 It is recommended the learner have a clear understanding of the criteria required in the rubric for the most optimal evaluation outcome.
Maryville Standard Discussion Board Rubric E
Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
Response to Discussion Question(s) 9 Points
Provides initial post by day 3 of the discussion forum. Includes substantial factually correct content which demonstrates evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes evidence of self-reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice. Includes all aspects of the discussion assignment. 7 Points
Provides initial post by day 4 of the discussion forum and or includes some evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes some evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings. Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice.
Includes some of the aspects of the discussion assignment. 4 Points
Provides initial post by day 4 of the discussion forum.
Includes minimal evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes minimal evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Connects topic/content to professional role and/or practice. Includes minimal aspects of the discussion assignment. 0 Points
Does not provide the initial post by day 4. Or content is off topic, incorrect, irrelevant, and/or does not include all aspects of the discussion assignment.
Peer Responses 7 Points
Provides two peer responses by day 6 of the discussion forum. Provides two peer posts on two different days.
Demonstrates building on peer postings and extending the discussion. Questions posed are thoughtful and relevant.
Includes substantial factually correct content which demonstrates evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes evidence of self- reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others. 5 Points
Provides two peer responses by day 6 of the discussion forum.
Provides two peer posts on two different days. Demonstrates some building on peer postings and attempt to extend the discussion. Some questions posed are thoughtful and relevant.
Includes some evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal.
Includes some evidence of self- reflective content which demonstrates views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others. 3 Points
Provides one peer response by day 6 of the discussion forum and/or peer responses are posted on same day.
Demonstrates minimal building on peer postings and attempt to extend the discussion. Minimal to no questions posed.
Includes minimal evidence of comprehension, application, and/or appraisal. Includes minimal evidence of self-reflective content on views, beliefs, and/or feelings.
Interaction demonstrates respect and sensitivity to others 0 Points
Peer responses are not provided.
References and Evidence 2 Points
Excellent
Provides 2 or more references with in-text citations to current literature and assigned readings to support assertions made on initial post and at least one or more references on peer discussion posts.
All postings are in correct APA format per the current edition of the Style Guide/Manual. 1 Point
Satisfactory
Provides 1 reference with in-text citation to current literature and assigned readings to support assertions made on initial post and at least one or more references on peer discussion posts.
All postings are in correct APA format per the current edition of the Style Guide/Manual. 0 Points
Unsatisfactory
Did not meet reference requirements to current literature or assigned readings to support assertions provided.
Excessive APA errors noted.
Clarity and Writing Mechanics 2 Points
Excellent
Provides clear, concise postings. Demonstrates the ability to synthesize literature and readings making postings in own words with credit to the author.
All postings are grammatically correct with proper spelling and structure. 1 Point
Satisfactory
Does not meet all of the following: Provides clear, concise postings. Demonstrates the ability to synthesize literature and readings making postings in own words with credit to the author.
All postings are grammatically correct with proper spelling and structure. 0 Points
Unsatisfactory
Postings are not clear and concise. Inability to synthesize literature and readings.
Inability to write in own words. Excessive grammar, spelling, and structure errors noted.