Chat with us, powered by LiveChat INFORMATICS TOOLS TO PROMOTE PATIENT SAFETY, IMPROVE WORK PROCESSES, AND PATIENT OUTCOMES - Nursing StudyMasters

INFORMATICS TOOLS TO PROMOTE PATIENT SAFETY, IMPROVE WORK PROCESSES, AND PATIENT OUTCOMES

Use the information from your assigned readings, the literature and leaders in your organization to write a 2-3 page paper that addresses the following questions. Title page and references are not included in 2-3 page limit.

Health care professionals have an ethical duty to ensure patient safety. Safe technologies are increasingly being implemented throughout health care organizations to improve patient safety, streamline work processes, and improve the quality and outcomes of health care delivery.

In a 2-3 page paper, you will discuss one (1) technology safety initiative that has been or can be implemented in a health care setting to improve patient safety and work processes, and improve patient outcomes.
You may use one of the following examples or chose your own. Some examples are:

Smart pumps
Bar code medication administration
Clinical decision support systems
RFID technology
Smart rooms
Wearable technology
Robotics

1. Describe the technology and its users.
2. What data is gathered using the technology?
3. What are the benefits to patient safety, workflow processes and patient outcomes?
4. What are the cons of this technology?
5. Do the benefits outweigh the cons? Provide rationale
6. Describe the role of the nurse leader in selecting, implementing and sustaining technology. Provide 2 examples of effectiveness of the technology of patient safety, workflow processes, and patient outcomes.

COURSE MATERIALS TO BE USED
Textbook

Effective Leadership and Management in Nursing
Eleanor J. Sullivan(2017)
Chapters 6

Articles:

2. Carol, W. (2019). The synthesis of nursing knowledge and predictive analytics.Nursing Management, 50(3), 15-17.

INSTRUCTIONS
References:
1. Minimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials PROVIDED ABOVE and two (2) peer-reviewed references.

2.All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)

3.Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines.

4. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.